top of page
Search

Cloud Database Price Comparison 2026: AWS vs Azure SQL vs Google Cloud Spanner – Save Thousands for Your Enterprise

  • Writer: Gammatek ISPL
    Gammatek ISPL
  • 1 day ago
  • 4 min read

Stop overpaying for cloud databases in 2026!

Discover which platform truly saves you thousands without compromising performance.

AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Spanner — the hidden costs will shock you. TL;DR: Choosing the wrong cloud database can cost your company 2–3x more in 2026. Here’s how AWS, Azure SQL, and Google Cloud Spanner stack up in real-world enterprise pricing.

Key Takeaways:

  • AWS: Flexible, scalable, but hidden I/O costs + storage can blow up your budget.

  • Azure SQL: Great for Microsoft-centric stacks, predictable pricing, moderate enterprise adoption.

  • Google Cloud Spanner: Enterprise-grade scalability, high performance, but comes at a premium.

  • True Cost Matters: Monthly plan ≠ real cost. Consider queries, storage, replication, and support.

  • Enterprise Example: A mid-sized SaaS firm reduced database costs by 47% by switching from AWS to Azure SQL.

  • Recommendation: Choose based on workflow complexity, regional latency, and query volume, not just sticker price. AWS vs Azure SQL vs Google Cloud Spanner pricing comparison for enterprise cloud databases in 2026. Cloud database pricing comparison 2026 Choosing the right cloud database service in 2026 means balancing performance, scalability, and cost. AWS, Azure SQL, and Google Cloud Spanner remain top contenders, each with unique pricing models and features. This post breaks down their pricing structures, helping you decide which fits your project and budget best. https://www.gammateksolutions.com/post/best-ai-tools-for-enterprises-in-2026-pricing-features-use-cases-and-comparison


cloud database pricing comparison 2026 showing AWS vs Azure SQL vs Google Cloud Spanner enterprise cost breakdown
AWS vs Azure SQL vs Google Cloud Spanner pricing comparison for enterprise cloud databases in 2026

Understanding Pricing Models for Cloud database pricing comparison 2026


https://www.gammateksolutions.com/post/openai-pricing-2026-what-costs-to-expect-for-enterprise-ai-adoption Cloud database pricing can be complex. Providers charge based on several factors:


  • Compute resources: CPU and memory usage

  • Storage: Amount of data stored

  • I/O operations: Reads and writes to the database

  • Networking: Data transfer costs

  • Licensing fees: For proprietary software or features


Each provider structures these differently, which affects total cost depending on your workload.


AWS Database Pricing Overview


https://www.gammateksolutions.com/post/top-10-enterprise-software-price-comparison-2026-what-companies-really-pay Amazon Web Services offers multiple database options, but for this comparison, we focus on Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS for SQL Server, as they compete directly with Azure SQL and Google Cloud Spanner.


Compute and Storage


  • Amazon Aurora charges per instance size (measured in vCPUs and RAM) and storage used.

  • Storage costs about $0.10 per GB per month for SSD.

  • I/O requests are billed separately, roughly $0.20 per million requests.


Licensing


  • Aurora includes licensing fees in the price.

  • RDS for SQL Server requires additional licensing fees depending on the edition.


Networking


  • Data transfer out to the internet is free up to 1 GB per month, then around $0.09 per GB.


Example Cost


A typical setup with a db.r6g.large instance (2 vCPUs, 16 GB RAM), 500 GB storage, and moderate I/O might cost around $400 per month.


Azure SQL Database Pricing Overview


https://www.gammateksolutions.com/post/top-10-enterprise-software-price-comparison-2026-what-companies-really-pay Azure SQL Database offers flexible purchasing models: vCore-based and DTU-based (Database Transaction Unit).


Compute and Storage


  • vCore model charges separately for compute and storage.

  • Compute starts at about $0.10 per vCore-hour.

  • Storage costs around $0.12 per GB per month.

  • Backup storage is charged separately.


Licensing


  • Licensing for SQL Server is included in the price.

  • Azure Hybrid Benefit can reduce costs if you have existing licenses.


Networking


  • Outbound data transfer is free up to 5 GB per month, then around $0.087 per GB.


Example Cost


A 4 vCore General Purpose database with 500 GB storage might cost approximately $600 per month.


Google Cloud Spanner Pricing Overview


https://www.gammateksolutions.com/post/best-enterprise-cybersecurity-platforms-in-2026-palo-alto-vs-fortinet-vs-crowdstrike-pricing Google Cloud Spanner is a fully managed, horizontally scalable relational database designed for global applications.


Compute and Storage


  • Charges based on nodes, storage, and network usage.

  • Each node costs about $0.90 per hour.

  • Storage is $0.30 per GB per month.

  • Reads and writes are included in node pricing, but additional charges apply for network egress.


Licensing


  • No separate licensing fees; pricing is all-inclusive.


Networking


  • Network egress is free up to 1 GB per month, then $0.12 per GB.


Example Cost


A 2-node Spanner instance with 500 GB storage costs roughly $1,400 per month.


Comparing Pricing for Common Use Cases


Category

AWS RDS

Azure SQL Managed Instance

Google Cloud Spanner

Core Offering

Relational DB (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server)

Fully managed SQL Server‑compatible DB

Globally distributed relational database

Primary Use Case

General‑purpose apps, web workloads

Enterprise apps with SQL Server needs

Global scale, low‑latency transactional systems

High Availability

Multi‑AZ deployment

Built‑in HA with automated failover

Multi‑region synchronous replication

Auto‑Scaling

Read replicas + instance resizing

Manual instance scaling

Horizontal scaling automatically across regions

Provisioned CPU/RAM

vCPU + RAM as per instance class

vCPU + RAM per instance tier

Serverless compute + storage separation

Storage Model

Auto‑provisioned SSD

Auto‑provisioned SSD

Distributed storage across nodes

Global Scale Support

Limited to regional replicas

Limited regionally

Native global scaling

Consistency Model

Eventual (replicas) / Strong (primary)

Strong consistency

True external consistency across zones

Security/SLA

Encryption at rest/in transit, 99.95% SLA

Azure AD integration + 99.99% SLA

IAM, encryption everywhere, 99.99+% SLA

Backup & Restore

Automated backups, snapshots

Point‑in‑time restore

Continuous backups with optimized restores

Monitoring & Tools

CloudWatch, Performance Insights

Azure Monitor, SQL Analytics

Stackdriver + custom metrics

Typical Small/Medium Pricing (Monthly)

t3.small: ~$50–$100

GP_Gen5_2: ~$150–$250

$0.90/hour + storage → ~$650+

Enterprise Tier Pricing (Annual)

Custom ($10k+ annually)

Custom ($15k+ annually)

Multi‑region instances $25k+

Cost Drivers

vCPU, storage, I/O

vCPU, memory, licensing

Multi‑region nodes, compute, storage

Best For

SMB & mid‑market cloud apps

Enterprise SQL workloads

Global transactional systems

Drawbacks

Scaling requires manual config

Higher cost for enterprise scale

Most expensive but most scalable

Factors Beyond Pricing to Consider



  • Scalability: Spanner excels at global scale with strong consistency.

  • Compatibility: Azure SQL integrates well with Microsoft tools.

  • Performance: Aurora offers high throughput with low latency.

  • Management: All three provide managed services, but ease of use varies.

  • Support and Ecosystem: AWS and Azure have extensive third-party integrations.


Tips to Optimize Cloud Database Costs


  • Choose the right instance size for your workload.

  • Use reserved instances or committed use discounts.

  • Monitor and optimize storage usage.

  • Minimize unnecessary data transfer.

  • Leverage licensing benefits if available.


Final Thoughts on Cloud Database Pricing in 2026


https://www.gammateksolutions.com/post/comparative-analysis-of-aws-azure-and-google-cloud-for-enterprises-in-2026-pricing-performance-and-u AWS, Azure SQL, and Google Cloud Spanner each offer strong cloud database solutions with distinct pricing models. AWS Aurora provides a cost-effective option for many workloads, Azure SQL fits well for Microsoft-centric environments, and Google Cloud Spanner suits large-scale, globally distributed applications despite higher costs.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page